Reference

·

Supporting source

·Preview

Hybrid hydro-solar LCOE compression versus standalone solar

~18-26%

As of2026 build cohort·Sources3·Supporting

Hybrid dispatch model (solar peaks daytime, hydro fires evening) compresses levelised cost of energy by an estimated 18-26 percent versus standalone floating-solar because shared grid interconnection, transformer, and substation capex avoids duplicate spend. Triangulated from EGAT Sirindhorn LCOE plus EPC tender benchmarks.

Compare plans →

Figure in context

Hybrid dispatch model (solar peaks daytime, hydro fires evening) compresses levelised cost of energy by an estimated 18-26 percent versus standalone floating-solar because shared grid interconnection, transformer, and substation capex avoids duplicate spend. Triangulated from EGAT Sirindhorn LCOE plus EPC tender benchmarks.

Hybrid dispatch model (solar peaks daytime, hydro fires evening) compresses levelised cost of energy by an estimated 18-26 percent versus standalone floating-solar because shared grid interconnection, transformer, and substation capex avoids duplicate spend. Triangulated from EGAT Sirindhorn LCOE plus EPC tender benchmarks.

Time scope

2026 build cohort

Source basis

Supporting source

Interpretation notes

What this tells you

Hybrid dispatch model (solar peaks daytime, hydro fires evening) compresses levelised cost of energy by an estimated 18-26 percent versus standalone floating-solar because shared grid interconnection, transformer, and substation capex avoids duplicate spend. Triangulated from EGAT Sirindhorn LCOE plus EPC tender benchmarks.

What not to do with it

Use the linked report for interpretation and keep basis differences explicit.

Related figures

Adjacent numbers that add context without drowning the value.

Report context

Atlas actors in this figure's reports

Profiles covered in the report that cite this number.

Hybrid hydro-solar LCOE compression versus standalone solar · Insight