Reference

·

Supporting source

·Preview

GPU-as-a-service share of Thai AI workload (2027 modelled)

~18-22%

As ofFY2027 modelled·Sources3·Supporting

Modelled share of Thai AI workload spend captured by GPU-as-a-service (rental and dedicated) versus hyperscaler colocation and captive on-prem. True IDC, NTT, ST Telemedia, GULF Edge anchors.

Compare plans →

Figure in context

Modelled share of Thai AI workload spend captured by GPU-as-a-service (rental and dedicated) versus hyperscaler colocation and captive on-prem. True IDC, NTT, ST Telemedia, GULF Edge anchors.

Modelled share of Thai AI workload spend captured by GPU-as-a-service (rental and dedicated) versus hyperscaler colocation and captive on-prem. True IDC, NTT, ST Telemedia, GULF Edge anchors.

Time scope

FY2027 modelled

Source basis

Supporting source

Interpretation notes

What this tells you

Modelled share of Thai AI workload spend captured by GPU-as-a-service (rental and dedicated) versus hyperscaler colocation and captive on-prem. True IDC, NTT, ST Telemedia, GULF Edge anchors.

What not to do with it

Use the linked report for interpretation and keep basis differences explicit.

Related figures

Adjacent numbers that add context without drowning the value.

Report context

Atlas actors in this figure's reports

Profiles covered in the report that cite this number.

GPU-as-a-service share of Thai AI workload (2027 modelled) · Insight